HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9834 of 2024 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the records. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the cognizance/summoning order dated 07.02.2024 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 165/1X of 2024 (arising out of Case Crime No. 289 of 2023) under Sections 420, 409, 506 I.P.C., P.S.-Chhata, District-Mathura pending in the court of learned Civil Judge (J.D./J.M.), Chhata, District- Mathura. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants states that an order was passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 11.08.2025 directing the applicants to file the said compromise deed before the court concerned which was to be verified by the court concerned. In pursuance of the said order, the court concerned on 01.09.2025 verified the said compromise. Copy of the same is on record. The same is not disputed by learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. 4. The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between the parties, is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of (1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed. 5. From perusal of the records and the law laid down by the Apex Court on the subject matter, the present case is a good case for exercising Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Prakash Singh, Sushil Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Vivek Sharma Yuvraj Singh And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) powers by this Court to quash the proceedings, as well as cognizance/summoning order as prayed for by the applicant(s). 6. The present application is allowed. 7. 6. The present application is allowed. 7. The entire proceeding as well as the cognizance/summoning order of the aforesaid case are hereby quashed. October 14, 2025 PS A482 No. 9834 of 2024 2 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad