Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19130 (CHH)

Narad Ram Sahu v. Tehsildar, Tehsil Abhanpur

WP227/782/2015 · 2025-04-08

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:16444 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 782 of 2015 1 - Narad Ram Sahu S/o Late Chamar Rai Sahu, Aged About 73 Years Village - Kendri, Tehsil Abhanpur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh......Objector, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Tehsildar, Tehsil Abhanpur District Raipur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Gangaram S/o Late Kartik Ram Sahu R/o Village Saatpaaraa, Tehsil Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Budhia Bai Wd/o Late Kartik Ram Sahu R/o Village Saatpaaraa, Tehsil Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Nemiram S/o Late Kartik Ram Sahu R/o Village Saatpaaraa, Tehsil Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Punaram Sahu S/o Manglu Sahu R/o Village Saatpaaraa, Tehsil Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Santram Sahu S/o Gulal Sahu R/o Village Saatpaaraa, Tehsil Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 7 - Sunil Kaushal S/o V. R. Kaushal, R/o Near Telephone Office, Tehsil - Abhanpur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For petitioner : Mr. Raja Sharma, Advocate For respective respondents : Mr. Prateek Tiwari, PL, Mr.Nikhil Wadhwani, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Awadh Tripathi, Advocate and Ms. Rekha Shrivastava, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Shivendu Pandya, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 08.04.2025 REKHA SINGH Digitally signed by REKHA SINGH -2- 1. Mr. Sharma, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner pleads no instruction. 2. Taking into consideration the submission made by Mr. Sharma, the present petition is dismissed in want of instruction. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive his prayer, if cause of action still subsists. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Rekha