APHC010266152025 0;*0 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PR AT AMARAVATI 0 FRIDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI r.ivil revision PETITION NO: 1556 OF 202_5 under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in Petition filed the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be directions to the Court of Xlll Additional pleased to issue appropriate orders or District Judge, Vijayawada for speedy and time bound disposal of A.S.No.316 of 2018, preferably within a period of three months, which was preferred dated 22-10-2018 passed in OS No.524 of Senior Civil Judge (Fast Track Court), against the Judgment and Decree 2005 on the file of the V Additional Vijayawada, Krishna District. Between: Josyula Bala, W/o.Prabhakara Sastry, aged about 67 years, R/o.D. No.23-23-9, Sivarao Street, Satyanarayanapuram, Vijayawada, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh. ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT N0.1/PLAINTIFF AND 1. Chalasani Babu Rajendra Prasad (Died). / . /' / M j 2. Chalasani Nagamani, W/o.Late Babu Rajendra Prasad, Hindu, aged about 58 years, R/o.D.No.31-12-13, Machavaram, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh. 3. Chalasani Kiran, S/o.Late Babu Rajendra Prasad, Hindu, aged about 41 years, R/o.D.No.31-12-13, Machavaram, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh. 4. Chalasani Murali, S/o.Late Babu Rajendra Prasad, Hindu, aged about R/o.D.No.31-12-13, Machavaram, Vijayawada, Andhra 37 years Pradesh. ...RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS 1 TO 4/DEFENDANTS 1 TO 4 5. Pothireddy Bhagya Lakshmi, D/o.P.Obul Reddy, R/o.D.No.41-26-6 3, Krishnalanka, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh. 6. Tirumala Ramakrishna Raju, S/o.Gopala Raju, R/o.Mutyalampadu, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh. 7. Akula Prasad, S/o.Srinivasa Rao, R/o.Peddaprolu Village, Mopidevi Mandal. 8. Mule Prasada Reddy S/o.Venkateswarlu, R/o.D.No.51-17-4 Ramalingeswara Nagar, Vijayawada, Andhra Pradesh. ...RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 2 TO 5/DEFENDANTS 5 TO 8 lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with the Certified Copy of the photo stat copies of adjournments in A.S No.316/2018 on the file of the XIII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada in the above C.R.P. Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI VENKATESH KOSARAJU Counsel for the Respondents : - The Court made the following ORDER : / 1 V '.V- y (RNT,J C.R.P.No.1556 of 2025) APHC010266152025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) PRADESH 0S [3299] FRIDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 155fi/?n?f^ Between: 1.JOSYULA BALA,, W/0. PRABHAKARA R/0. D. SASTRY, AGED ABOUT 67 SIVARAO YEARS, SATYANARAYANAPURAM, ANDHRA PRADESH. NO.23-23-9, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT, STREET, ...PETITIONER AND 1.CHALASANI BABU RAJENDRA PRASAD (DIED). 2. CHALASAN I NAGAMANI, W/0 LATE i HINDU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARSBABU RAJENDRA PRASAD, 5 R/0 D NO 31-12-13 MACHAVARAM, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. 3.CHALASANI KIRAN, S/0 LATE BABU RAJENDRA PRASAD, HINDU ED ABOUT 41 YEARS, . R/0 D. NO.31-12-13 MACHAVARAm' VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. viauhavaRAM 4.CHALASANI MURALI HINDU, MACHAVARAM, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESK S/0 LATE BABU RAJENDRA R/0 D. PRASAD, NO.31-12-13, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS 5 POTHIREDDY BHAGYA LAKSHMI, D/0 P, OBUL REDDY R/0 D NO.41-26-63, KRISHNALANKA, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. 6.TIRUMALA RAMAKRISHNA RAJU, S/0 GOPALA RAJU MUTYALAMPADU, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. R/0. 2 (RNT,^ C.R.P.No.l556 of2025) 7.AKULA PRASAD, S/0 SRINIVASA RAO, R/0 PEDDAPROLU VILLAGE, MOPIDEVI MANDAL. 8.MULE PRASADA REDDY, S/0 VENKATESWARLU, R/0 D. NO.51-17- 4, RAMALINGESWARA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to Issue appropriate orders or directions to the Court of Xlil Additional District Judge, Vijayawada for speedy and time- bound disposal of A.S. No. 316 of 2018, preferably within a period of three months or such time as may be deemed fit by this Honble Court and Pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be Pleased to dispense with the Certified Copy of the photo start copies of adjournments in O.S. No. 524/2005 on the file of the XIII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada in the above C.R.P. and Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.VENKATESH KOSARAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): pass 1. 3 ■v (RNT,J C.R.P.No.1556 of 2025) The Court made the following; ORDER: This Civil Revision Petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, by the petitioner/respondent No. 1/plaintiff seeking direction to the learned trial Court for speedy disposal of A.S.No.316 of 2018 on the file of the XIII Additional District Judge at Vijayawada, filed by the appellants, being aggrieved from the decree dated 22.10.2018 passed in O.S.No.524 of 2005 on the file of the V Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada, seeking specific performance of agreement of sale dated 28.02.2002. 2. The appeal was filed in the year 2018. Nothing has been brought on record to demonstrate that the case is of an exceptional nature warranting expedited disposal. In Sangram Sadashiv Suryavanshi V. State of 3. Maharashtra^, the Hon’ble Apex Court referring to the Constitution Bench judgment in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad V. State of Uttar Pradesh^, observed at paragraph No.7 as under: “In paragraph 47.3 of the the decision of a Constitution Bench of in the Case of 'High Court Bar Association, Allahabad v. State of Uttar Pradesh', this Court has held that in the ordinary course, the Constitutional Courts should refrain from fixing a time-bound schedule for the ' 2024 see Online Se 3526 " (2024) 6 see 267 mil 4 C.R.P. Other Courts, pending before any disposal of Paragraph 47.3 reads thus. cases the ordinary course, "47.3. Constitutional courts, should refrain from ifxing a time-bound schedule for the other courts. m disposal of cases pending before any Constitutional courts may issue directions for the time- exceptional only in bound disposal of circumstances. The issue of prioritising the disposal of cases should be best left to the decision of the courts cases concerned where the cases are pending. such a case, (supra), As held in Sangram Sadashiv’s 4. direction can be issued only in exceptional circumstances. In the present record to show that it is a case of an to warrant the speedy disposal of the suit. nothing has been brought on case, exceptional nature so as In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed, shall be at liberty to approach the concerned Court, 5. However, the petitioner where the case is pending. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall SD/- N.NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR also stand closed. //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The XIII Additional District Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2, The V Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division) (Fast Track Court), Vijayawada, Krishna District. 3. One CC to Sri Venkatesh Kosaraju, Advocate [OPUC] Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi 5. Two CD Copies BSV TAC 4. The HIGH COURT DATED:11/07/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 1556 OF 2025 OfAfiS St' § 19 SEf 2025 m & * 3 DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION WITHOUT COSTS