1 2025:CGHC:4870 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3630 of 2018 Khuleshwar Kaushik S/o Shri Kamta Prasad Kaushik, Aged About 32 Years Working As Teacher (Panchayat) And Posted At Govt. Middle School Khariya, Block Bodla, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Kabirdham, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh., District : Kawardha (Kabirdham), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Vinod Sharma, Advocate For State/ Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Dashrath Prajapati, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 28/01/2025 1) By way of this petition, petitioner has sought following relief(s):- (i) That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent to consider and count earlier service of petitioner for grant of revised pay scale without insisting upon NOC, in the interest of justice. (ii) Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be granted. AJINKYA PANSARE Digitally signed by AJINKYA PANSARE Date: 2025.01.28 17:19:17 +0530 2 2) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that initially petitioner was appointed on the post of Shiksha Karmi Grade-III vide order dated 28.06.2010 and thereafter, pursuant to fresh advertisement, he was appointed on the post of Teacher (Panchayat) on 06.01.2011. He contends that according to the judgment passed by this Court in W.P. (S) No. 2530/2017, petitioner would be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of eight years service by including the services rendered by him on a lower post or on the same post. He prays that petitioner may be permitted to make a representation before respondent authorities, who in turn may be directed to consider the representation of petitioner in an objective manner. 3) On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes. 4) Heard. 5) Taking into consideration the limited prayer made by Mr. Sharma, this petition at this juncture is disposed of reserving liberty in favor of petitioner to make a representation before respondent authorities. If such representation is made, respondent authorities are directed to consider it in objective manner preferably within period of 90 days from the receipt of representation. 6) Accordingly, instant writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Ajinkya