HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30867 of 2025 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri N.K. Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State and Sri Bablu Pant, counsel for the informant. Perused the record. 2. The present bail application has been filed with a prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 519 of 2025, under Sections 105, 110 B.N.S., Police Station- Kankar Khera, District- Meerut during pendency of the trial. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant was the driver of the Eicher Canter vehicle. It is contended that the incident occurred due to an accident. The alleged Canter vehicle was not being driven in a rash or negligent manner. The driver of the Omni car, Shahnawaz has been granted bail by this court vide order dated 17.9.2025 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 30701 of 2025 (Shahnawaz vs. State of U.P). The applicant claims parity. The applicant is in jail since 1.8.2025 having no criminal history. In case he is enlarged on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned A.G.A. for the State and counsel for the informant have opposed the prayer for bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having heard counsel for the parties and having perused the record, this Court prima facie finds that at this stage, there is no substantive evidence to Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manoj Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Babloo Pant, G.A. Gulfam .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) link the applicant with the offence. The driver of the Omni car Shahnawaz has been granted bail by this court. The applicant has no criminal history. Further the applicant has presently remained confined for more than two months and there is no hope of early conclusion of trial, more so when no reasonable apprehension has been brought to the fore by the State that the applicant, if enlarged on bail, would either tamper with the evidence or intimidate the witness, without commenting on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant, Gulfam involved in the aforesaid case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned on the following conditions that: i. the applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence; ii. the applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witness; iii. the applicant shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court. October 15, 2025 S.S. BAIL No. 30867 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad