BRIGADIER BHUPESH SINGH S/O SHRI VIJAYRAJ SINGH v. MAHENDRA KUMARI W/O LATE SHRI PRATAP SINGH JI
CW/7927/2025 · 2025-07-03
Vinod Kumar Bharwani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19122 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19122 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:24562] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7927/2025 Brigadier Bhupesh Singh S/o Shri Vijayraj Singh, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Raghukul, Colonel Hh Bahadur Singh Circle, Police Lines Road, Bundi (Raj.) And Moti Mahal, Bundi (Raj.) 323001. Presently 26Th Gaadipati, Hada-Chauhan Raajvansh, Bundi (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. Mahendra Kumari W/o Late Shri Pratap Singh Ji, R/o Phool Bagh. Presently Phool Sagar, Bundi (Since Deceased)
2. Jitendra Singh S/o Late Shri Pratap Singh, R/o Phool Bagh Palace, Alwar.
3. Ranjit Singh S/o Late Bahadur Singh, R/o Phool Sagar, Bundi (Since Deceased)
4. Kuldevi Ashapura Mataji Moti Mahal, Bundi Through Alleged Sevait/ Trustee Jitendra Singh S/o Late Shri Pratap Singh, R/o Phool Bagh Palace, Alwar. (Substituted By Order Dated 11.09.2024).
5. The East India Hotels Limited, Registered Office At 4, Mangoe Lane, Kolkata. Administrative Office At 7, Shyamnath Marg, Gali, Delhi. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. G.P. Sharma with Mr. Mahesh Chand Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bipin Gupta Mr. Saransh Saini Ms. Suruchi Kasliwal with Ms. Alisha Chopra HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
Order 03/07/2025
[2025:RJ-JP:24562] (2 of 2) [CW-7927/2025]
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the final decree has been passed by the learned Trial Court on 02.07.2025. He also submits that the petitioner has preferred an appeal against the preliminary decree dated 30.11.2005 passed by learned Trial Court. He further submits that the respondent No.3 i.e. The East India Hotels Limited has also preferred an appeal against the aforesaid preliminary decree. Heard. In the present matter, since the learned Trial Court has already passed the final decree dated 02.07.2025, the present writ petition has rendered infructuous. In view of the above, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous with liberty to the petitioner to raise all his objections/ submissions in the appeal. However, it is made clear that the petitioner may take recourse of legal remedy, if any available, against the final decree dated 02.07.2025. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J SAURABH /106