Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 191218 (ALL)

KRISHNA KUMAR SHARMA AND 8 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/32466/2025 · 2025-10-09

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 32466 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard Sri Hitesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for applicants, Sri Arvind Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for State. 2. This application has been filed by the applicants to quash the cognizance as well as summoning order dated 16.6.2025 passed by learned Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Court no. 6, Mirzapur in Criminal Case no. 335/2025 and charge sheet dated 10.3.2025 under sections 305, 329(2), 334(1) of BNS, PS- Jigana, District Mirzapur. 3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that he relinquishes the prayer for quashment and wishes to move bail application before the trial court. 4. Sri Arvind Kumar Singh, learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and learned AGA for State have no objection to the prayer so made. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for applicants, it is provided that in case the applicants appears before the court concerned within four weeks from today and move application for bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of in accordance with law. 6. For a period of four weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ajay Singh, Hitesh Kumar Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Arvind Kumar Singh, G.A. Krishna Kumar Sharma And 8 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 7. If extended bail by learned court concerned, only applicant nos. 3, 4 and 7 namely Manju Devi, Hema Sharma and Urmila Sharma will be permitted to appear before learned court concerned through counsel. 8. It is made clear that in the event no such bail application is moved within the time prescribed above, this order will be of no avail to the applicants. 9. With the above direction, the instant application stands disposed of. However, it is made clear that none of the grounds are convincing for seeking quashing of orders impugned along with entire proceeding. October 10, 2025 Shaswat NA528 No. 32466 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad