Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 191188 (ALL)

NAJEEB AHMAD SIDDIQUI AND 9 OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/21575/2025 · 2025-10-13

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 21575 of 2025 Court No. - 43 HON'BLE SALIL KUMAR RAI, J. HON'BLE DIVESH CHANDRA SAMANT, J. Heard the counsel for the petitioners and the A.G.A. for the State. The present petition has been filed challenging the First Information Report dated 26.08.2025 registered as Case Crime No. 377 of 2025, under Sections 318(2), 115(2), 352, 351(3), 74 & 85 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (B.N.S.), 2023 & Section 4 of D.P. Act, Police Station- Talbehat, District- Lalitpur. We have perused the FIR, which prima facie discloses cognizable offences against the petitioners and therefore, the prayer made to quash the FIR cannot be entertained in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the cases of State of Telangana Vs. Habib Abdullah Jellani reported in (2017) 2 SCC 779 and Neeharika Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra and Others reported in (2021) SCC Online SC 315 and as such, we are of the view that no interference is warranted. However, considering the fact that all the offences, complained of in the impugned FIR, are punishable with a term up to seven years, therefore, in case of effecting the arrest of the petitioners in pursuance of the impugned FIR, it is directed that the respondents/ authorities shall ensure that the specific provisions contained in Section 41(1)(b) and Section 41-A of CrPC/Section 35(3) to 35(7) of Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the guidelines issued by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar Vs. State of Bihar, (2014) 8 SCC 273 as well as the directions issued in judgement and order dated 28.01.2021 of this Court passed in Criminal Misc. Writ Petition No. 17732 of 2020 (Vimal Kumar and 3 Others Vs. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Praveen Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. Najeeb Ahmad Siddiqui And 9 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) State of U.P. and 3 Others) reported in 2021 (2) ACR 1147, be strictly complied with. With the aforesaid observations, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. October 14, 2025 Prachi CRLP No. 21575 of 2025 2 (Divesh Chandra Samant,J.) (Salil Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRACHI KESARWANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad