Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 191183 (ALL)

HAR PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/3767/2025 · 2025-10-12

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 3767 of 2025 Court No. - 87 HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. By means of the present application under Section - 529 B.N.S.S., the applicant has sought for a suitable direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh to expedite the Case No. 224 of 2018 (Har Prasad Vs Wahid Ahmad Juberi), u/s 138 Negotiable Instrument Act, Police Station- Banna Devi, District-Aligarh, pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh, within time stipulated by this Court. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is informant in the aforesaid case, which is pending since the year 2018 but no substantial progress has been made in the trial so far. Learned counsel has further submitted that this Court may direct the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh to decide the case of the applicant as soon as possible. 4. In view of aforesaid, the Trial court concerned is directed to expedite the proceedings of the aforesaid case and to decide the same as early as possible, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy copy of this order before the court concerned, provided there is no legal impediment. 5. The application under Section 529 B.N.S.S. is disposed of accordingly. October 13, 2025/Mukesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sonu Kumar Tiwari, Yogesh Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Anil Kumar-X,J.) Har Prasad .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- MUKESH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad