Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010209212025 2025:GAU-AS:12835 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No.: I.A.(Civil)/3028/2025 MS VIVEK TRANSPORT AGENCY A PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM WITH ITS REGISTERED ADDRESS AT SOHSARAI THANA SOHSARAI DISTRICT NALANDA PIN 803118 WHICH IS REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR KUMAR VIVEK AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS S O ANIL KUMAR PRESENTLY RESIDING AT VILLAGE JHAGRARPAR PT 3 KHALIPUR DIST DHUBRI ASSAM VERSUS RAJIB HAQUE S/O SAHIDUL HAQUE R/O SOUTH HAIBARGAON GHUTLAIPATTY HUSSAIN ALI HAZARIKA ROAD PS NAGAON SADAR DIST NAGAON ASSAM 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 3:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 4:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BISWANATH DIST BISWANATH PIN 78417 Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : WP(C)/4627/2025 RAJIB HAQUE S/O SAHIDUL HAQUE R/O SOUTH HAIBARGAON GHUTLAIPATTY HUSSAIN ALI HAZARIKA ROAD PS NAGAON SADAR DIST NAGAON ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ORS REP BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM FOOD CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS DEPTT DISPUR GUWAHATI 6 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BISWANATH DIST BISWANATH PIN 784176 For the petitioner (s) : Mr. K. Baruah, Advocate For the respondent (s) : Ms. R. Devi, Advocate BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 17.09.2025 It is seen that the interim order passed by this Court on 14.08.2025 was till 27.08.2025. Prior to the order dated 14.08.2025, on 12.08.2025, the contract in question was already awarded to the applicant and further agreement was also entered into on 12.08.2025. Page No.# 3/3 2. The record does not show that on 27.08.2025, the interim order was extended. It is also seen that there is no application filed by the writ petitioner subsequent thereto for the purpose of extension of the interim order. 3. Consequently, it is therefore the opinion of this Court that the interim order passed on 14.08.2025 no longer survived beyond 27.08.2025. Under such circumstances the instant application has become infructuous and accordingly closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant