RAJESH KUMAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIC/13292/2025 · 2025-10-12
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191177 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191177 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 13292 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Ms. Pratiksha Rai, learned counsel for the petitioners states that in view of the subsequent developments, no cause of action survives and accordingly the petitioners do not wish to pursue the matter any further. Abhishek Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, appearing for the State respondents as well as Sri Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Gram Sabha, have no objection. The petition stands disposed of accordingly. October 13, 2025 Arun K. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Amit Gupta, Himanshu Shukla, Pratiksha Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Rajesh Kumar And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad