JITENDRA KUMAR S/O SHRI NAND KISHORE v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
WMAP/94/2025 · 2025-07-03
Mahendar Kumar Goyal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19116 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19116 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:24529] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 94/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6598/2023 Jitendra Kumar S/o Shri Nand Kishore, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Poonam Colony, Gali No. 6, Near Punjab Kirana Store, Kota (Raj.). ----Petitioner-Applicant Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Depart- ment Of Energy, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Chief Personnel Officer, Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Lim- ited, Vidyut Bhawan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.).
3. Superintending Engineer (O And M), Jaipur Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Chittor Road, Bundi.
4. Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Bundi (Raj.).
5. Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 95/2025 In S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6621/2023
1. Ashish Gahlot S/o Shri Ram Prasad Gahlot, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 19/43, Gahloto Ka Kua, Near Railway Un- derbridge, Dhola Bhata, Ajmer (Raj.).
2. Sanyogita Dadhich D/o Shri Ghanshyam Sharma W/o Shri Keshav Dadhich, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Vpo Choti Khati, District Nagaur (Raj.).
3. Pooja Bohra D/o Shri Madhu Sudhir Bohra W/o Bhupendra Phulwari, Aged About 34 Years, R/o Gori Kunj, Mohan Munoth Nagar, Street No. 8, College Road, Beawer (Raj). ----Petitioners-Applicants Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Depart- ment Of Energy, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Managing Director, Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel Nagar, Makarwali Road, Ajmer (Raj.)
3. Secretary (Adm.), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Panchsheel Nagar, Makarwali Road, Ajmer (Raj.).
[2025:RJ-JP:24529] (2 of 3) [WMAP-94/2025]
4. Superintending Engineer (O And M), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Nagaur (Raj.).
5. Superintending Engineer (Acc), Ajmer Vidyut Vitran Nigam Limited, Ajmer (Raj.)
6. District Education Officer, Department Of Secondary Edu- cation (Headquarters), Ajmer.
7. District Education Officer, Department Of Secondary Edu- cation, Nagaur.
8. Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, Durgapura, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Pragya Seth For Respondent(s) : Mr. Abhishek Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL
Judgment / Order 03/07/2025 S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 94/2025:- Although, this civil miscellaneous application has been filed for recalling of the order dated 05.05.2025 passed by this Court in SB Civil Writ Petition No.6598/2023; however, learned counsel for the applicant submits that she would feel contended if in the direction No. (ii) of the order dated 05.05.2025, instead of Clause 7 of the appointment orders, Clause 5 is mentioned.
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/respondents has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. In view thereof, the application is allowed to the extent prayed for. In the condition No. (ii) of the order dated 05.05.2025,
“Clause 5” be read in place of “Clause 7”. This order may be treated as part and parcel of the order dated 05.05.2025.
[2025:RJ-JP:24529] (3 of 3) [WMAP-94/2025] S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 95/2025:- Although, this civil miscellaneous application has been filed for recalling of the order dated 05.05.2025 passed by this Court in SB Civil Writ Petition No.6621/2023; however, learned counsel for the applicants submits that she would feel contended if in the direction No. (ii) of the order dated 05.05.2025, instead of Clause 7 of the appointment orders, Clause 8 for the petitioners/applicants No.1 and 2 and Clause 5 for petitioner/applicant No.3 is mentioned.
Learned counsel for the non-applicants/respondents has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. In view thereof, the application is allowed to the extent prayed for. In the condition No. (ii) of the order dated 05.05.2025,
“Clause 8” be read in place of “Clause 7” for the petitioners/applicants No.1 and 2 and “Clause 5” be read in place of “Clause 7” for the petitioner/applicant No.3. This order may be treated as part and parcel of the order dated 05.05.2025.
(MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J Manish/287-288