Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 191106 (MAD)

AKASH v. The State rep.by, Inspector of Police

CRL OP/34682/2025 · 2025-12-18

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.OP.No.34682 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 18.12.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.34682 of 2025 Akash ... Petitioner Vs. The State rep by Inspector of Police, Sholavaram, Tiruvallur District. Crime No.735 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the event of his arrest, pending investigation in Cr.No.735 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioners : Mr.Ali Hassan Khan For Respondent : Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 126(2), 296(b), 109, 125, 351(3) r/w 3(5) of BNS in Crime No.735 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police seek anticipatory bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.34682 of 2025 2. The prosecution case is that the petitioners herein joining hands with other accused waylaid the defacto complainant, the others attacked him with knife and other deadly weapons caused severe injuries. Hence complaint has been lodged after admitting the victim in this hospital. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners herein is not named in the FIR and falsely implicated in this case. and they are ready to cooperate with the investigation and hence, prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. il to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner herein is also involved in the occurrence and attacked the injured and totally three persons sustained injuries and the petitioner is also having seven previous case, out of which, three are similar in nature and hence opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. .Considering the nature of allegations and the fact that though injured is alleged to have discharged from the hospital and considering the bad antecedents, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.34682 of 2025 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 18.12.2025 Vv To 1.The Inspector of Police, Valathy Police Station, Villupuram District. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.OP.No.34682 of 2025 K.RAJASEKAR , J. Vv Crl.O.P.No.34682 of 2025 18.12.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis