HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 830 of 2024 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri G.K. Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri V.R. Tiwari, learned counsel for petitioner and Sri Prabhakar Awasthi, learned counsel for respondents. 2. At this stage, this writ petition is disposed of with following observations and directions :- "a. The Vice Chancellor will decide the issue of recommendation so made by Committee of Management of school concerned for termination of petitioner, if already not decided, within a period of 3 weeks from today. b. Since presently proposal is neither accepted nor rejected, therefore, at this stage, there is no adverse order against the petitioner. c. Meanwhile, Management will pay due salary to the petitioner, however, Management will be at liberty to deduct disputed amount towards HRA, subject to outcome of any other proceedings. d. The benefit of work up to 62 years cannot be curtailed even according to service book, service was accepted up to 60 years only, since not only it is disputed but petitioner can get benefit of any beneficial provision, which got accrued at later stage of his service and there is a requirement of submitting an option. However, it would remain subject to outcome of proceedings pending before the Vice Chancellor." October 13, 2025 N. Sinha Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Tanisha Jahangir Monir, V.R. Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Chandra Prakash Tiwari, Prabhakar Awasthi, Shesh Kumar Srivastava (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Pramod Kumar Pateriya .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIRMAL SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad