SHASHANK MANI TRIPATHI ALIAS GOLU TIWARI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/33664/2025 · 2025-10-13
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191093 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191093 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 33664 of 2025 Court No. - 74 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
1. Compliance affidavit filed today by learned AGA is taken on record.
2. The full Bench judgment passed in Ghulam Rasool Khan and others Vs. State of U.P. and others the Court in para-17 (iii) has held that Question No. (III) is answered in negative holding that the aggrieved person having remedy of appeal under Section 14A of the 1989 Act, cannot be allowed to invoke inherent jurisdiction of this Court under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
3. In view of the aforesaid judgment, the applicant is permitted to withdraw the application with liberty to avail appropriate remedy.
4. The application is, accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to avail alternative remedy.
5. Certified copy of the F.I.R./order sheet be returned to the applicant as per rule after retaining a photo-stat copy of the same on the record. October 14, 2025 Sanjeet Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Abhishek Pandey, Krishna Kant Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Deepak Verma,J.) Shashank Mani Tripathi Alias Golu Tiwari And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SANJEET KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad