HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 18556 of 2025 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1.Supplementary affidavit preferred today on behalf of applicants is taken on record. 2. Heard Mr. Khalid Mahmood, learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA for the State. 3. Present application has been preferred with a prayer to quash charge sheet dated 22.4.2024 as well as entire proceeding of Case no. 1865 of 2025 and cognizance and summoning order dated 5.3.2025 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat (State vs. Krishn Verma and others) arising out of Case Crime no. 19 of 2024 under sections 147, 148, 506, 452, 504, 323, 324 IPC, PS- Baghpat, District Baghpat. 4. In compliance of earlier order dated 28.8.2025 passed by this Court, compromise verification report has already been received from learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baghpat and the same is appended to order sheet wherein it is mentioned that compromise has been verified on dated 10.9.2025 in presence of both the parties. 5. Learned AGA for the State showed no objection to aforesaid contention of learned counsel for applicant. 6. From perusal of records, it transpires that the parties have Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : G.A., Iqubal Hussain, Khalid Mahmood Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Lokesh Kumar Vinod Verma And 7 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) amicably settled their dispute and fact of compromise has been confirmed and admitted by learned counsel for the parties. The same cannot be disputed in absence of learned counsel for opposite party no. 2 and it has been submitted by learned counsel for applicant that there would be no harm and error and it would be in the interest of justice that the proceedings may be quashed in light of the compromise. 7. A three-Judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab & another, (2012) 10 SCC 303, has observed in para 58 of the said judgment that where the High Court quashes a criminal proceeding having regard to the fact that the dispute between the offender and the victim has been settled although the offences are not compoundable, it does so as in its opinion, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties is put to an end and peace is resorted; securing the ends of justice being the ultimate guiding factor. 8. In the case of Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia v. Sambhajirao Chandraojirao Angre, [(1988) 1 SCC 692], Hon'ble the Apex Court has also observed that where matters are also of civil nature i.e. matrimonial, family disputes, etc. the Court may consider "special facts", "special feature" and quash the criminal proceeding to encourage genuine settlement of disputes between the parties. 9. In view of the aforementioned facts and circumstances, the entire proceeding of Case no. 1865 of 2025 (State vs. Krishn Verma and others) arising out of Case Crime no. 19 of 2024 under sections 147, 148, 506, 452, 504, 323, 324 IPC, PS- Baghpat, District Baghpat, are hereby quashed, only in respect of applicants namely Vinod Verma, Krishna Verma, Sandhya Verma, Aashi Verma, Rinki Verma, Basu, Nitin and Toni. 10. Accordingly, the present application stands allowed. 11. The parties may file the copy of this order before the court NA528 No. 18556 of 2025 2 concerned within three weeks from today. 12. If at all, opposite party no. 2 feels that he/she has been duped or betrayed, then in that event, he/she may file recall application explaining the reasons for filing the said application. October 17, 2025 Shaswat NA528 No. 18556 of 2025 3 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad