SMT. LEELAWATI DEVI v. UNION OF INDIA AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/35113/2025 · 2025-10-13
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191041 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 191041 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35113 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J.
HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J.
1. Heard Sri Vipin Srivastava, holding brief of Sri Bhupesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms.Anita Kushwaha, holding brief of Sri Sanjay Kumar Om, learned counsel for the respondent no-1, Sri Pranjal Mehrotra, learned counsel appearing for the N.H.A.I. and Sri Ambrish Shukla, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking following reliefs:-
"(i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to direct, Respondent No. 3- Additional Collector (Administration)/Competent Authority (Land Acquisition Officer) District-Deoria to consider the objection of petitioner dated 01.05.2025 pending before him within specific period."
3. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for N.H.A.I. has submitted that the S.L.A.O. has already issued notice to the petitioner to furnish the details so that the actual compensation may be disbursed.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has filed his objection on 01.05.2025, appended as Annexure-4 to the writ petition and the same be decided in accordance with law.
5. Considering the factual aspect of the issue involved, without adverting into the merit of the case, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with an Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhupesh Kumar Singh, Mahendr Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I., C.S.C., Dinesh Kumar Singh, Pranjal Mehrotra, Sanjay Kumar Om Smt. Leelawati Devi .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And 6 Others .....Respondent(s)
observation that in case, the petitioner moves a detailed representation within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be considered and decided by the respondent no.2 in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all the stakeholders. Needless to say that in case, if the claim of the petitioner is sustainable in the eyes of law and documents are furnished as has been asked by the S.L.A.O. on 18.11.2024, then the amount shall be released in accordance with law, if there is no impediment for the same. October 14, 2025 Sumit S WRIC No. 35113 of 2025 2 (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad