HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 13223 of 2025 Court No. - 82 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. 1. Heard Sri Himanshu Mishra, learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA for the State and perused the records. 2. In pursuance of the earlier order of this Court, Additional C.J.M, Court No. 1, Agra vide letter dated 02.09.2025 has informed this Court that the matter has been compromised and duly verified by both the parties. 3. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants with a prayer to quash the entire proceeding of charge sheet dated 11.06.2024 and summoning order dated 11.12.2024 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No. 24462 of 2024 (State vs. Mohan Singh and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 270 of 2024, under Sections 332, 353, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station Jagdishpura, District Agra, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants states that an order was passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 21.08.2025, directing the applicants to file the compromise deed before the court concerned which was to be verified by the court concerned. In pursuance of the said order, the court concerned vide order dated 02.09.2025 verified the said compromise. Copy of the same is on record. The same is not disputed by learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. 5. The law with regards to quashing of a case on the basis of settlement arrived between the parties, is well settled. The Apex Court in the cases of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Himanshu Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Suvansit Kumar Jaiswal, G.A. Mohan Singh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) (1) B.S. Joshi and others Vs. State of Haryana and another: (2003)4 SCC 675; (2) Nikhil Merchant Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation : (2008) 9 SCC 677; (3) Manoj Sharma Vs. State and others: ( 2008) 16 SCC 1; (4) Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab: (2012) 10 SCC 303; (5) Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. And another: 2013 (83) ACC 278 and (6) Parbatbhai Ahir@Parbatbhai @ Bhimsinbhai Karmur and others Vs. State of Gujarat and another: (2017) 9 SCC 641 has held that the cases in which the parties have settled their grievances can be quashed. 6. From perusal of the records and the law laid down by the Apex Court on the subject matter, the present case is a good case for exercising powers by this Court to quash the entire proceedings, charge sheet and summoning order as prayed for by the applicants. 7. The present application is allowed. 8. The entire proceedings, charge sheet and summoning order of the aforesaid case is hereby quashed. October 17, 2025 Manoj NA528 No. 13223 of 2025 2 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- MANOJ KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad