Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 191014 (ALL)

DHARAMVEER AND 12 OTHERS v. STATE OF UP AND 3 OTHERS

CMRA/136/2025 · 2025-10-09

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 136 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE DONADI RAMESH, J. 1. Heard Sri A.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicants / petitioners and Sri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The instant review application is preferred to review the order dated 07.03.2025 passed in Writ-C No.41620 of 2024 whereby the writ petition was consigned to records with following observations: "Although, it is stated that in the writ petition that in collusion with Lekhpal, the Pradhan has occupied the land, but such allegations are absolutely vague and neither the Pradhan has been impleaded as a party nor other persons against whom such allegations are made have been impleaded. In such circumstances, we find substance in the instructions of the respondents, according to which, there is a private dispute, for which the remedy would be before the competent Civil Court. Leaving it open for the petitioner to approach the competent Court for necessary relief, this petition is consigned to records." 3. Learned counsel for the applicants / petitioners fairly submits that the order dated 07.03.2025 passed by this Court is to be reviewed to the extent that the instant writ petition may be disposed of granting liberty to the applicants / petitioners to approach the competent authorities / competent revenue court qua grievance of the applicants / petitioners. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ashok Kumar Srivastava, Sabana Azami Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Sunil Kumar Singh Dharamveer And 12 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of Up And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 4. Sri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents has no objection to the propositions. 5. Accordingly, the order dated 07.03.2025 passed by this Court is recalled. The instant review application is allowed. 6. Consequently, the writ petition stands disposed of with the observations that the applicants / petitioners are at liberty to approach the competent authorities / competent revenue court qua redressal of their grievances. October 10, 2025 rkg CMRA No. 136 of 2025 2 (Donadi Ramesh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad