Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 190993 (ALL)

SAMEER KHAN v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS

CRLP/19661/2025 · 2025-10-16

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 19661 of 2025 Court No. - 49 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. HON'BLE GARIMA PRASHAD, J. Learned AGA for the State submits that the petitioner duped the first informant of her money by making false promise of getting his son employed. A forged appointment letter has also been issued to the first informant’s son by the petitioner. A prima facie offence is disclosed against the petitioner. Faced with this, Shri Ashish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not wish to press the relief for quashment of the F.I.R. in the writ petition. The relief sought in the writ petition is accordingly rejected. Learned counsel for the petitioner recasts his relief and submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to approach the competent court for anticipatory bail and other legal remedies available with them. It is always open to the petitioner to avail legal remedies to protect their liberty under the law. The writ petition is disposed of. October 17, 2025 Kuldeep Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Garima Prashad,J.) (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Sameer Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad