Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19098 (GAU)

CHINU ROUTH (DAS) v. THE ALLAHABAD BANK AND 4 ORS.

WP(C)/6457/2019 · 2025-08-04

Kaushik Goswami

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010204862019 2025:GAU-AS:10169 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6457/2019 CHINU ROUTH (DAS) W/O- LT. RABINDRA CHANDRA DAS, RESIDENT OF CHINU VILLA, NETAJI ROAD, RAMKRISHNA NAGAR, P.S. RAMKRISHNA NAGAR, DIST.- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM. PIN- 788166. VERSUS THE ALLAHABAD BANK AND 4 ORS. REP. BY THE CHAIRMAN, ALLAHABAD BANK, 2. N.S. ROAD, KOLKATA- 700001. 2:THE GENERAL MANAGER ALLAHABAD BANK 2. N.S. ROAD KOLKATA- 700001. 3:THE CHIEF MANAGER (TD) PERSONAL ADMINISTRATIVE DEPTT. H.O. ALLAHABAD BANK 2 N.S. ROAD KOLKATA- 700001. 4:THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER ZONAL OFFICE ALLAHABAD BANK OPP. BORA SERVICE STATION G.S. ROAD ULUBARI GUWAHATI ASSAM-17. 5:THE BRANCH MANAGER Page No.# 2/2 ALLAHABAD BANK JALALPUR BRANCH P.O.-JALALPUR DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM-16 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. I ALAM, MS. R R BORAH,MR. T SK Advocate for the Respondent : SC, ALLAHABAD BANK, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 05.08.2025 Heard Mr. T. Sheikh, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner. None appears for the respondents on call. Mr. T. Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner had expired and the only surviving legal heir, i.e., son of the writ petitioner, i.e., Chiranjit Das has instructed that he does not wish to be substituted in the place of the writ petitioner. That being so, the instant writ petition stands abated. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed on being abated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant