HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35641 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. This petition has been filed challenging the order dated 10.09.2025 passed in S.A. No. 387 of 2024, M/s Kalyani Enterprises and other Vs. Authorized Officer State Bank of India and others passed by the respondent no.2 and the order dated 17.09.2025 passed by the respondent no.3. 2. A preliminary objection has been raised by Sri Prareet Kumar, learned counsel appearing for respondent no.4 that against the orders impugned, the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing an appeal before the DRAT. 3. Since there is a statutory alternative remedy, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. The grievance of the petitioner that during pendency of the appeal, it might be possible that the petitioner may be dispossessed. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that his clients will file appeal along with stay application on or before 17.10.2025. In case, such an appeal is filed, the respondents are directed to be present and they may file their objections before the D.R.A.T. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anil Kumar Mehrotra, Raj Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : Arpita Tarmali, C.S.C., Krishna Mohan Asthana, Sanjay Kumar Gupta, Satish Chaturvedi M/S Kalyani Industries, A Partnership Concern And 5 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up Through Its Secretary (Finance And Revenue) And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) within a period of one week and the D.R.A.T. is directed to consider and decide the stay application within a period of ten days, after providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. 5. With the aforesaid direction, this petition stands disposed of. October 13, 2025 Radhika WRIC No. 35641 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad