Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 190923 (ALL)

SMT. HIMANI YADAV v. ANSHUL YADAV

A227/12414/2025 · 2025-10-12

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12414 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "direct the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bulandshahr to decide the Misc. Case No. 546 of 2024 (Smt. Himani Yadav v. Anshul yadav) under Order -IX Rule 13 of C.P.C. pending before him, expeditiously within stipulated period." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the Misc. Case No. 546 of 2024 under Order -IX Rule 13 of C.P.C. is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Principal Judge, Family Court, Bulandshahr to consider and decide the aforesaid case, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Pankaj Goswami Counsel for Respondent(s) : Smt. Himani Yadav .....Petitioner(s) Anshul Yadav .....Respondent(s) this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 13, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 12414 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad