Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19092 (RAJ)

AZIZ BEG S/O ANWAR BEG v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6418/2025 · 2025-06-13

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23209] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6418/2025 1. Aziz Beg S/o Anwar Beg, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Ward Number 42, Mohalla Muglan Kasba Jhunjhunu, Ps Kotwali Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu (Raj) 2. Isa @ Yusuf Mirza S/o Nawab Beg Mirza, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Ward Number 42, Mohalla Muglan Kasba Jhunjhunu, Ps Kotwali Jhunjhunu, District Jhunjhunu (At Present Accused Is Confined In Judicail Custody At District Jail, Jhunjhunu) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Farooq Ahmed For Complainant(s) For State : : Mr. Hemant Kankoriya Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.) Order 13/06/2025 1. The accused-petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.66/2025 registered with the Police Station Kotwali Jhunjhunu for offence under Sections 189(2), 127(2) & 115(2) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made at bar so also perused the material made available on record. 4. Taking into consideration the nature of allegations levelled against the present accused-petitioners, so also the fact that there [2025:RJ-JP:23209] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6418/2025] is no specific overt act assigned to the present accused-petitioners and more particularly the fact admitted by learned counsel appearing for the complainant that the parties have already entered into a compromise, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA (V. J.)),J ARTI SHARMA /150