Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 6524 of 2025 Radha Krishna Nayak ..... Petitioner Mr. S.C. Sahoo, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 02.04.2025 Order No. 01 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition inter alia with the following prayer: - “Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it is therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to : (i) direct the Opp. Parties to grant similar benefits by antedating the promotion of the Petitioner to the Cadre of Jr. SES, as has been given to similarly situated persons viz., Kartik Dash, Umakanta Panda, Prabino Kuma Patro, Pratyusa Kumar Dash, Sudhansu Kumar Choudhury, Dillip Kumar Badapanda and others vide Annexure- 16, in the light of recent decision of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP (C ) Diary No.16580/2024 and SLP (C) Diary No.16586 of 2024 and grant all consequential service and financial benefits, within a stipulated period of time as may be fixed by this Hon’ble Court; Page 2 of 2. (ii) pass such other order(s) or issue direction(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the bona fide interest of justice.” 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner states that highlighting his grievances, Petitioner has made a representation before Opposite Party No.1 vide Annexure-18 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.1 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-18 within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order and communicate the result of such exercise to the Petitioner. 6. The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of with the aforesaid observation and direction. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha