HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11499 of 2025 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Jitendra Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press the writ petition as the order impugned is a remand order and a direction may be issued to the rent authority to conclude the rent proceedings, expeditiously. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or calling for counter affidavit and in view of the statement so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed, however, the rent authorities are hereby directed to proceed with the matter post remand expeditiously and conclude the matter within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, strictly in accordance with law. October 14, 2025 A. V. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Arun Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Jitendra Kumar, Prasoon Tomar (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Anees Ahmad Jafri .....Petitioner(s) Smt. Shamim Bano .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad