IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.11596 of 2025 Decided on: 30th July, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Chande Ram …..Petitioner Versus HRTC & Ors .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vinod K. Gupta, Advocate. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Vinod K. Gupta, learned counsel, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred a representation dated 01.05.2025 (Annexure P-6) to respondent No.1 for the redressal of his grievances raised in this writ petition. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 be content in case respondent No.1/competent authority is directed to decide the aforesaid representation within a fixed time schedule. Learned counsel for the respondents is not averse to this prayer. 4. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent No.1 / competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner dated 01.05.2025 (Annexure P-6) in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua July 30, 2025 Judge R.Atal