M. P. Lakshmi Kumari v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/15810/2022 · 2025-09-01
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19089 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19089 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010265282022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 15810/2022 Between:
1. M. P. LAKSHMI KUMARI, W/O. M. SRINIVASA RAO, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O. PLOT NO. SRT.2, DR.NO.60-27-152, RAMAKRISHNAPURAM, INDUSTRIAL COLONY, MALKAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
2. THE GRATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP.
BY ITS COMMISSIONER, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
3. THE CITY PLANER, GRATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION VISAKHAPATNAM.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MALKAPURAM PS, VISAKHAPATNAM.
5. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM.
6. BAMMIDI ESWARA RAO, S/O., LATE TATA RAO, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RIO., DR. NO. 60-20-150, NEAR INDUSTRIAL COLONY, MALKAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM.
2
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the inaction of the respondents 2 to 5 herein in removing the structure raised by the respondent no.6 in Sy. No.32 of Industrial Colony, Malkapuram, Visakhapatnam which is used as a road/rasta by the petitioner and others for their ingress and egress into their homes as bad, illegal, arbitrary, unjust and consequently direct the respondents to remove the structure raise by respondent no.6 in Sy. No.32 at industrial Colony, Malkapuram, Visakhapatnam IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent to considered the representation of the petitioner Dt. 27.05.2022 and remove the structure raised in Sy. No.32, Industrial Colony, Malkapuram, Visakhapatnam pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. V S K RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. MURALI LINCOLN
3. J DILEEP KUMAR
4. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV The Court made the following:
3
Order:
Sri M. Karthik, the learned counsel representing Sri V.S.K. Rama Rao,
learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that the petitioner is not inclined to pursue the writ petition any further.
2. Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
3. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
______________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date : 02.09.2025 PNS