HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4155 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Sri Deepak Kumar Jaiswal and Sri Santosh Kumar Shukla, learned counsel appeared for the opposite party. 2. Learned counsel appeared for the opposite party states that boundary wall which was constructed over the plot in question has been removed by the opposite party and possession of the vacant land has been handed over to the applicant. 3. Sri Shailesh Verma, learned counsel for the applicants has admitted the fact that boundary wall has been removed. He has also admitted that the applicant has got possession of the property in question. 4. In this view of the matter, no cause of action survives to maintain the instant contempt application. 5. As such, instant contempt application is dismissed as infructuous. October 17, 2025 vkg Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Prakash Verma, Ranjana Verma, Shailesh Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Deepak Kumar Jaiswal, Santosh Kumar Shukla (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Kishan Lal .....Applicant(s) Dr. Indramani Tripathi, District Magistrate And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINOD KUMAR GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad