Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19088 (GAU)

FATIMA BEGUM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 12 ORS

WP(C)/3521/2016 · 2025-05-01

Manish Choudhury

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010204832016 2025:GAU-AS:5403 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3521/2016 FATIMA BEGUM D/O- MASSADDAR ALI, R/O VILL.- USHNABAZ, P.O.- ANGLAR BAZAR, P.S.- BADARPUR, DIST.- KARIMGANJ, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 12 ORS REP. BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECY., HOME DEPTT., GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY- 6. 2:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE B.P. KATAKY ROAD ULUBARI GHY- 7 ASSAM. 3:THE DY. COMMISSIONER KARIMGANJ P.O. and DIST.- KARIMGANJ ASSAM. 4:THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KARIMGANJ P.O. and DIST.- KARIMGANJ ASSAM. 5:BADARPUR POLICE STATION BADARPUR DIST.- KARIMGANJ ASSAM REP. BY SRI ISHWAR SINGH OFFICER-IN-CHARGE Page No.# 2/3 BADARPUR POLICE STATION P.O.- BADARPUR DIST.- KARIMGANJ ASSAM. 6:MONI SINGH SUB-INSPECTOR BADARPUR POLICE STATION BADARPUR P.O.- BADARPUR DIST.- KARIMGANJ ASSAM. 7:RANJIT KR. SINGH ASSTT. SUB-INSPECTOR BADARPUR POLICE STATION P.O.- BADARPUR DIST.- KARIMGANJ ASSAM. 8:ABDUL MUSABBIR 9:ALA UDDIN 10:SALIM UDDIN 11:HUSSAIN AHMED 12:AZIR UDDIN 13:AKIR UDDIN RESPONDENT NOS. 8 TO 13 ARE THE SONS OF LT. USMAN ALI ALL ARE R/O VILL.- HARINADIK P.O.- ANGLARBAZAR P.S.- BADARPUR DIST.- KARIMGANJ ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.J I BORBHUIYA, MR.L MOHAN,MR H I CHOUDHURY,MR.K H CHOUDHURY Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, MR.A K TALUKDAR(R-8,9,11&12),MR.F K R AHMED(R-8,9,11&12),MR.M SHARMA(R-8,9,11&12) Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER 02.05.2025 Mr. L. Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the subject-matter of the writ petition has become infructuous. Ms. M. Barman, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent nos. 1 to 5 is present. In view of the above submission made by Mr. Mohan, learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition being infructuous, stands closed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant