RAMESH v. SRI. JITENDRA PRATAP SINGH, COLLECTOR / DISTRICT MAGISTRATE
CAPL/4768/2025 · 2025-10-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190866 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190866 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4768 of 2025 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J.
1. Copy of compliance affidavit filed by the opposite party today in Court is taken on record. Office to proceed accordingly.
2. Learned Standing Counsel representing opposite party states that order passed by this Court has been complied with; therefore, no cause of action survives to maintain the instant contempt application.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant has admitted the compliance of the order passed by this Court and prayed to dismiss the instant contempt application as infructuous. 4 In this conspectus, as above, instant contempt application is dismissed as having become infructuous. October 29, 2025 vinay Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sachin Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Dinesh Pathak,J.) Ramesh .....Applicant(s) Sri. Jitendra Pratap Singh, Collector / District Magistrate .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VINAY KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad