HAKIM SINGH S/O RAMJILAL v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/6450/2025 · 2025-07-08
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19085 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19085 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:25147] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6450/2025 Hakim Singh S/o Ramjilal, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Norangabad, Police Station, Shri Mahaveer Ji, Presently Resident Of Road Kalan, Police Station, Sadar Karauli (Rajasthan). (Presently Confined In Sub Jail, Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta with Mr. Rahul Sharma Mr. Chanchal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 08/07/2025
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.70/2021 registered at Police Station-Wazirpur, District Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 143, 352, 336 of IPC
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that this is a case of no injury. He argues that main accused Attar has arrived at a compromise and the FIR lodged against him was
[2025:RJ-JP:25147] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6450/2025] quashed by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 07.03.2025. He further submits that other co-accused Lakhan and Kishan Singh was enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. The case of the petitioner is akin to that of co-accused who have been granted bail. The petitioner is behind the bars since
03.03.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, hence the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the bail application.
5.
Learned counsel for the complainant has submitted that there is one criminal antecedent exists against the present petitioner. He has submitted that the petitioner has violated earlier
order of this Court dated 07.03.2025, therefore, he is not entitled for any relief.
6. On consideration of the rival submission and material available on record and deliberating all the facts and circumstances of the case and especially the fact that co-accused has been enlarged on bail, without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioner-Hakim Singh S/o Ramjilal shall be released on bail in connection with FIR No.70/2021 registered at Police Station-Wazirpur, District Sawai Madhopur on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of
[2025:RJ-JP:25147] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6450/2025] Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court for his appearance before that Court on all the dates till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J MAHIMA/87