Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:34928
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 476 of 2022 Nikhat Parvin W/o Aijaz Khan Aged About 35 Years R/o Rajnandgaon, Salim Bhai Mitti Tel Wale, Janta Colony, Near Pani Tanki, Ward No. 30, Quarter No. 224, Lakholi Road,, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh
--- Applicant versus Aijaz Khan S/o Saphi Khan Aged About 39 Years Tambakoo Wale, R/o Village Nainpur, Near Badi Masjid, Tahsel / Post/ Ps Nainpur, District Mandala Madhya Pradesh Present Work Place And Address - Post System Administration, Tata Cunsultancy Services (T.C.S.), East Block 10, Level 5, Sector 01, R.K. Puram, Delhi, New Delhi 110001 New Address - T.C.S. Company, Passport Service Center Foreign Mantralaya, First Floor, Block No. 10, R.K. Puram, Sector-1, New Delhi 110066, District : New Delhi, Delhi
--- Respondent For Applicant : Mr. S.K. Singh, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Advocate. CRR No. 521 of 2022 Aijaj Khan S/o Safi Khan, Aged About 39 Years R/o Village Nainpur Near Badi Masjid, Tehsil/ Post/ Police Station Nainpur, District : Mandla, Madhya Pradesh
---Applicant PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2025.07.23 10:58:08 +0530
2 Versus Nikhat Parveen W/o Aijaj Khan, Aged About 35 Years R/o Ward No. 30, Quarter Number 224, Lakholi Road, Janta Colony, Near Water Tank, Rajnandgaon (Chhattisgarh)
--- Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. Priyank Rathi, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. S.K. Singh, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
Order on Board 22.07.2025
1. In CRR No.476/2022, the present revision has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer:-
“It is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this revision application and enhance the maintenance amount for the interest of justice.”
2. In CRR No. 521/2022, the present revision has been filed by the applicant with the following prayer:-
“It is, therefore, humbly prayed that, the Hon’ble Court may kindly allow the Revision and order passed by the Ld. Judge, Family Court, Rajnandgaon be set-aside in the interest of justice and it may be held that the respondent is not entitle to any maintenance amount.
3.
Learned counsel for the parties submits that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.
4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the parties, the present revisions are disposed of as the matter has been amicably settled between the parties.
5. Let a copy of this order as well as original record of this case be
3 transmitted to the trial Court concerned forthwith for necessary information and compliance. Sd/-
(Ramesh Sinha)
Chief Justice
Preeti