Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36925 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SAUMITRA DAYAL SINGH, J.
HON'BLE INDRAJEET SHUKLA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. Recovery has been issued pursuant to the maintenance order passed under Section 125 Cr.P.C.
3. Civil writ petition filed to challenge such recovery is misconceived. It is accordingly dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to avail statutory remedy in accordance with law. October 29, 2025 Faraz Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mukesh Chandra Gupta, Shubham Prakash Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Indrajeet Shukla,J.) (Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.) Jitendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- FARAZ AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad