Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 190816 (ALL)

VIDYOTMA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS

NA529/3774/2025 · 2025-10-12

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 3774 of 2025 Court No. - 87 HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. 2. Learned counsel for the applicants has submitted that he is the informant in Sessions Trial No. 3346 of 2018 (State vs. Mintu Giri and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 359 of 2018, under Sections 147, 148, 323, and 304 I.P.C., Police Station Ramkola, District Kushinagar, which is pending before the Court of Additional District Judge/F.T.C.-I, Kushinagar. 3. It is further submitted that all the witnesses of fact have already been examined and only two formal witnesses remain to be examined by the learned trial court. It has, therefore, been prayed that the learned trial court be directed to conclude the aforesaid sessions trial at the earliest. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the learned trial court concerned is directed to make all possible endeavours to conclude Sessions Trial No. 3346 of 2018 (State vs. Mintu Giri and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 359 of 2018, under Sections 147, 148, 323, and 304 I.P.C., Police Station Ramkola, District Kushinagar, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months from the date of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anup Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vidyotma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Opposite Party(s) production of a certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. 5. Accordingly, the application is disposed of. October 13, 2025 Sumaira NA529 No. 3774 of 2025 2 (Anil Kumar-X,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad