Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 190810 (ALL)

SOHIL SOHIT v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/34432/2025 · 2025-10-13

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34432 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR SINGH DESHWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Anil Pratap Singh Raghav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri D.P.S. Chauhan, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No.0699 of 2025, under Sections- 352, 109(1) BNS, Police Station-Khurja Nagar, District-Bulandshahar, during the pendency of the trial. 3. Contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that in the FIR allegation has been made against the co-accused Jatin for causing knife injury to the injured which itself is a simple injury and there is a recovery of knife on pointing out of the co-accused Jatin. It is further submitted that till date the statement of injured, Hrithik, has not been recorded by the police. Learned AGA also did not dispute the same on perusal of case diary. It is further submitted that the applicant has no criminal history. The applicant is a law abiding citizen and he is languishing in jail since 10.08.2025. In case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute that till date the statement of injured has not been recorded and same is not available in the case diary. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Pratap Singh Raghav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sohil Sohit .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 6. Let the applicant- Sohil Sohit, involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- i. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. iv. The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 8. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. October 14, 2025 S.C. BAIL No. 34432 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar Singh Deshwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM CHAURASIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad