Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1908 (BOM)

TUSHAR S/O SANDEEP GILL AND ANR. v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

APL/921/2025 · 2026-03-04

Urmila Joshi Phalke

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 38.APL.921-2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APL) NO. 921 OF 2025 ( Tushar S/o Sandeep Gill & Anr. Vs. State of Maharashtra, Thr. Police Station Officer, Police Station M.I.D.C., Nagpur & Anr. ) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. D.V. Mahajan, Advocate for the Applicants. Mr. Neeraj Jawade, APP for the Non-applicant No.1/State. Ms. S.K. Phaltankar, Advocate (Appointed) for the Non-applicant No.2. CORAM: URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J. DATED : 04th MARCH, 2026 1. Heard learned Counsel for the Applicants to some extent. After perusal of the investigation papers when I have shown my disinclination to entertain the Application, learned Counsel for the Applicants, seeks permission to withdraw the Application. 2. The Application is disposed of as withdrawn. 3. Fees of the learned appointed Counsel be quantified as per rules. 4. Pending application/s, if any, shall stand disposed of accordingly. (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) SD. Bhimte 2026:BHC-NAG:3642-DB