Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19079 (HP)

ASHU SHARMA v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

EX.P./904/2025 · 2025-07-23

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Ex. Pet. No.904 of 2025 Decided on: 23rd July, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ashu Sharma …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Dixit Sahotra, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No.1. Mr. Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for respondents No.2 to 4. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Petitioner seeks execution of decision rendered in Ashu Sharma Versus State of H.P. & Ors.2. Learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4 has placed on record copy of office order dated 20.07.2025, whereby the pay of the petitioner has been re-fixed and submits that judgment in question stands complied with. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that financial benefits/arrears in terms of aforesaid order have not been released to the petitioner. 1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes 2CWP No.7232 of 2025, decided on 07.05.2025 2 3. Learned counsel for respondentsNo.2 to 4 submits that financial benefits/arrears in terms of the aforesaid order shall be released to the petitioner within one week from today. 4. In view of documents placed on record and submission made by learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4, this execution petition is disposed of with hope and trust that financial benefits in terms of the aforesaid order shall be paid to the petitioner within one week, i.e. by 30.07.2025, as submitted by learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, to also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua July 23, 2025 Judge Mukesh