HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 4346 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J. HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The sole grievance of the petitioner is that respondent-authority is not refunding the money deposited by the petitioner for increasing electricity load, but it was not increased. In respect to his grievances, petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent-authority, but respondent-authority is not paying any heed to the request of the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that no useful purpose would be served in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent no.3 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent no.3-Executive Engineer, Paschimanchal Vidhyut Vitran Khand Nigam Limited, Modinagar, Ghaziabad, within a period of one month from today. In case, any such Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dinesh Kumar Maurya, Ram Raj Prajapati Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pranjal Mehrotra Anshul Kumar Prajapati .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent no.3 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of one month thereafter from the date he receives representation of the petitioner. October 10, 2025 Virendra WRIC No. 4346 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad