PHULPATI DEVI v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 2 OTHERS
WRIB/3129/2025 · 2025-10-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190763 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 190763 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3129 of 2025 Court No. - 33 HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction that the recall application along with substitution application dated 24.08.2023 of petitioner filed in Case no. 32 of 1971 before Consolidation Officer (Antim Abhilekh), Basti be decided within a stipulated time. Learned Standing Counsel has placed the instructions in pursuance to the
order dated 12.08.2025 passed by this Court. It is further informed that the application for substitution of the petitioner in the above said case has already been decided by the respondent no.2 vide
order dated 25.09.2025. Be that as it may, without going into merits of the case, the respondent no.2- Consolidation Officer (Antim Abhilekh), Basti is directed to decide the recall application dated 24.08.2023 of the petitioner notably annexed as Annexure No.2 to the writ petition in Case No.32/71 (Ramroop Vs. Raj Kumari) in accordance with law after affording due opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed off. October 29, 2025 Virendra Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashutosh Ojha, Ram Mani Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) Phulpati Devi .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIRENDRA KUMAR BHARTEEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad