Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19076 (CHH)

TIRTHRAJ SAHU v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3229/2025 · 2025-05-06

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2025:CGHC:20890 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3229 of 2025 1 - Tirthraj Sahu S/o Shri Rajkumar Sahu Aged About 35 Years Occupation - Range Forest Officer, State Forest Research And Training Institute, Near Vidhan Sabha Raipur, Distt - Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Forest Department, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan New Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest & Head Of Forest Force Chhattisgarh, Aranya Bhawan, Sector 19, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Additional Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest A.P.C.C.F. (Administration Non Gazetted) Chhattisgarh, Aranya Bhawan, Sector 19, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest & Director State Forest Research And Training Institute Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. R. S. Patel, Advocate For Respondents/ State : Mr. Kanwaljeet Singh Saini, Panel Lawyer (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2025.05.08 10:28:48 +0530 2 / 2 07/05/2025 1. By the present writ petition, the petitioner is seeking a direction towards the respondent authorities to provide the documents as prayed in the representation submitted by the petitioner before respondent No.2 as the same is necessary for the petitioner to file reply to the show cause notice dated 27/08/2024 (Annexure P/1). 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that though the petitioner submitted his request letter to the respondent No.2 but till date neither the documents sought by the petitioner have been supplied to him nor the representation has been decided by the authorities. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents/ State submits that if the representation of the petitioner is still pending before the respondent No.2, the same shall be considered in accordance with law and if the documents are available with the Department, the same shall be supplied to the petitioner within the stipulated time. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 5. In view of the submission made by the counsel for the State, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the pending representation dated 24/11/2024 submitted by the petitioner in accordance with law and if the documents are available with the Department, the same shall be supplied to the petitioner, within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar