HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15343 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Amit Maurya, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Jai Singh Chandel, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that the the writ petitioner was appointed as Sub-Inspector in the year 1992 and he retired on 31.07.2016. In the wake of a criminal case bearing number "479 of 2025" under Section 307 IPC, the writ petitioner's pensionery benefits were withheld, which the writ petitioner was entitled to on 31.07.2016 and a final report came to be submitted on 10.09.2010. Since the writ petitioner was not made entitled to the post-retiral benefits, the writ petitioner preferred Writ-A No.8226 of 2023, which came to be disposed of on 11.05.2023 requiring the competent authority to pass order and in pursuance thereof, the Superintendent of Police, Amroha proceeded to pass an order on 09.07.2023 in favour of the writ petitioner and according to the writ petitioner, he was made admissible to the benefits in the month of August 2023 to the tune of Rs.28,55,759/-. 3. Grievance of the writ petitioner is that the petitioner has been paid the post-retiral benefits after approximately 7 years, thus the interest is be also paid. He seeks to rely upon a Division Bench judgment of this Court in Bindal Agro Chemical Ltd. and another Vs. State of U.P. and others, (2004) U.P.T.C. 564 . 4. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that whatever might be, it was the duty of the writ petitioner to have informed the competent authority and the office regarding exoneration of the writ petitioner and it is on account of the delay and lethargy on the part of the writ petitioner, which Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ambuj Maurya, Atipriya Gautam, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Ram Chandra Ram .....Petitioner(s) The State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) attributed to delay in payment. However, he submits that a conscious decision would be taken by the Respondent no.4/ Superintendent of Police, Amroha. 5. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.4/ Superintendent of Police, Amroha by 31.10.2025, who on the said motion shall proceed to consider the claim of the writ petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months thereafter. October 13, 2025 N.S.Rathour WRIA No. 15343 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad