HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 22367 of 2018 Court No. - 2 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. List has been revised. No one is present on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition though learned Standing Counsel and Sri Vibhu Rai, learned counsel on behalf of respondents are present. 2. It has been argued by learned counsel for the respondents that due to subsequent development, the present writ petition has become infructuous. 3. Since no one is present on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed in default. October 13, 2025 Gaurav Kuls Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Naseem Rufi Q Alrafio B.M. Mugaanii, Shikha Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anoop Trivedi (Senior Adv.), C.S.C. (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Virendra Kumar Pal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GAURAV KULSHRESTHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad