Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19072 (JHR)

RAJU RAJWAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6881/2025 · 2025-08-08

Deepak Roshan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:23028 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6881 of 2025 --------- Raju Rajwar, aged about 37 years, S/o Late Mangru Rajwar, R/o Village- Bardanda Tolla, Bhitadish, PO & PS-Mohamadganj, District-Palamau, Jharkhand. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sheo Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Sanat Kumar Jha, A.P.P. --------- 02/Dated:-08.08.2025 1. Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 287/304/379/420/34 of I.P.C. and under Section 33 of the Indian Forest Act in connection with Haidarnagar P.S. Case No.50 of 2007 corresponding to GR Case No.1714/2007 S.T. No. 188A/2016. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and he has not committed any offence as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that the petitioner is a labourer and is the sole earning member of his family and he has got no criminal antecedents. He further submits that the petitioner for no offence has been languishing in custody since 11.04.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. He submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition as imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation made against this petitioner coupled with the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 11.04.2025; therefore, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the 2025:JHHC:23028 2 satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Palamau in connection with Haidarnagar P.S. Case No.50 of 2007 corresponding to GR Case No.1714/2007 S.T. No. 188A/2016. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and he shall not threaten any witnesses and shall co-operate in trial and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) vikas/-