HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12682 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " I.direct learned trial court to expedite the temporary injunction application 6C under Order 39 Rule 1 & 2 CPC in Civil Suit No.792/2025 (Shobharam Vs. Tejpal), pending in the Court of learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gautam Budh Nagar as early as possible within a stipulated period." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Gautam Budh Nagar to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 17, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Daya Shanker Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Tejpal .....Petitioner(s) Shobharam .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad