2025:JHHC:22019-DB Page | 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OFJHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. A (D.B.) No. 836 of 2025 --------- 1. Chandan Kumar Rawani, aged about 46 years, S/o Shankar Rawani, R/o- Dharmabandh Basti, P.O. & P.S.- Madhuban, Dist- Dhanbad. 2. Dilip Mishra @ Dilip Kumar Mishra, aged about 49 years, S/o Sukhdeo Mishra, R/o Brahmandiha Basti, Vill. Sinidih, P.O. Tundoo, P.S. Madhuban, Dist- Dhanbad. … … Appellants Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Respondent --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ---------- For the Appellants : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashistha, Spl.P.P. ----------- 03/Dated:06th August, 2025 1. Heard Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, learned counsel for the appellants and Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashistha, learned Special Public Prosecutor appearing for the State. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 24.03.2025 and 19.06.2025 passed in connection with ABP No. 825 of 2025 and 1373 of 2025 arising out of Madhuban (Dharmaband O.P.) P.S. Case No. 01 of 2025 by the learned Additional Sessions Judge- XVI, Dhanbad, whereby and whereunder the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellants have been rejected. 3. It has been alleged that with respect to marking the land of BCCL for mining of coal, two separate groups had assembled and they went on rampage, which resulted in hurling of bombs, damaging vehicles and even the officer-in-charge of Dharmabandh P.S. had suffered injuries. 2025:JHHC:22019-DB Page | 2 4. Submission has been advanced by the learned counsel for the appellants that the allegations leveled against the appellants are general and omnibus in nature and similarly situated other co- accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Cr. Appeal (D.B) No. 447 of 2025, Cr. Appeal (D.B) No. 474 of 2025, Cr. Appeal (D.B) No. 524 of 2025. 5. Mr. Vineet Kumar Vashistha, learned Spl.P.P. appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the appellants but has not disputed the fact with respect to the similarity in the case of appellants to that of the co-accused persons who have been granted anticipatory bail by this court. 6. Regard being had to the above, we while setting aside the orders dated 24.03.2025 and 19.06.2025 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge-XVI, Dhanbad in ABP No. 825 of 2025 and ABP No. 1373 of 2025 arising out of Madhuban (Dharmabad O.P.) P.S. Case No. 01 of 2025, direct the appellants, above named, to surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks and on their surrender, the learned Court below shall release them on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-XVI, Madhuban subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 7. Accordingly, this appeal stands allowed and disposed of. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Amar/-