HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 35214 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners; Shri Samar Bahadur, Ms. Uttara Bahuguna, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for State respondents and Ms. Ishita Sand holding brief of Ms. Anjali Upadhya, learned counsel for Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (in short "Authority"). 2. The instant writ petition has been preferred for a direction to respondents to give 64.7% additional compensation to the petitioners under the strength of the order of this Court in the case of Gajraj v. State of U.P. & Ors., 2011 (11) ADJ 1 and for a direction to respondent no.3 to decide the representation of the petitioners dated 09.09.2025 within stipulated period. 3. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the issue, the writ petition stands disposed of asking respondent no.3 to decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioners in accordance with law expeditiously. October 14, 2025 Pkb/ Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ganga Dhar Shukla, Samar Bahadur Harijan Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Mohan Lal And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD KUMAR BAJPAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad