Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19067 (RAJ)

BANE SINGH MEENA SON OF NEMJI MEENA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/2970/2025 · 2025-05-23

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:21895] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2970/2025 1. Bane Singh Meena Son Of Nemji Meena, 2. Prem Bai Wife Of Bane Singh Meena, 3. Hemraj Meena Son Of Bane Singh Meena, 4. Deepak Meena Son Of Bhagwan Singh Meena, 5. Abhishek Meena Son Of Bhagwan Singh Meena, 6. Bhagwan Singh Meena Son Of Sukaram Meena, 7. Bhushan Meena Son Of Sookaram Meena, 8. Seema Devi Wife Of Bhagwan Singh Meena, 9. Asha Devi Wife Of Chetram Meena, 10. Khushbu Tatu Daughter Of Chetram Meena, All resident Of Village Post Meena Baroda, Tehsil Wazirpur, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). 11. Priyanka Meena Daughter Of Misra Lal Meena Wife Of Hemraj Meena, Resident Of Village Kutakpur, Tehsil Hindaun City, District Karauli (Rajasthan). ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. 2. Umesh Singh Son Of Atar Singh, Resident Of Shyaroli, Police Station, Wazirpur, District Sawai Madhopur (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For State For Complainant : : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Ms. Teenu Sogarwal, SI, SHO, PS Wazirpur, Sawai Madhopur Mr. Biri Singh Sinsinwar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Jawant Singh Rathore HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 23/05/2025 1. The present petition is filed under Section 528 of BNSS for quashment of the impugned FIR No. 25/2025 registered at Police Station Wazirpur District Sawai Madhopur for the offence under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 324(4), 308(2) BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:21895] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-2970/2025] 2. In compliance of the erstwhile directions of the Court, Investigating Officer has marked presence and has submitted that on the very next date of the incidence, certain altercations occurred amongst the parties herein however, the same has no connection or relation with the partnership deed/dispute in question. 3. Considering the above-said submissions, this Court directs that a fair, proper and impartial investigation be carried out in the FIR (Supra) under the supervision of an officer not below the rank of Superintendent of Police, strictly in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly, present petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja/320