2025:HHC:1121 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Cr.MPM No.1841 of 2024 Decided on: 6th January, 2025 __________________________________________________________ Bhim Bahdaur …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr. Anubhav Chopra, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Pratush Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Ranjan Sharma, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel for the bail petitioner submits that after the filing of instant petition, the petitioner is not in touch with him and for want of Instructions the instant petition cannot be pursued further and in these circumstances, he prays for permission to withdraw the instant petition. [Statement taken on record]. 2. Taking into account the entirety of the facts and circumstances and the statement made by Learned 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2025:HHC:1121 Counsel for petitioner, instant petition is rendered infructuous, at this stage, alongwith all pending applications, if any. (Ranjan Sharma) Judge January 06, 2025 (himani)