2025:HHC:23879 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA Exe. Pt. No. 947 of 2025 Decided on : 23.07.2025 Sudesh Kumari. …Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another. …Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Pawan Kumar Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. He submits that the judgment in issue will be complied with, within a period of three weeks from today. His statement is taken on record. 2. In view of the above, these proceedings are closed, with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival thereof, by filing an 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2025:HHC:23879 appropriate application, if needful is not done within a period of three weeks from today by the Authority concerned and Registry shall not insist upon the application being accompanied by the affidavit of the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge July 23, 2025 (Shivank Thakur)